Signalling block system
Signalling block systems enable the safe and efficient operation of railways to avoid collisions between trains. Block systems are used to control trains between stations and yards and not normally within them. Any block system is defined by its associated physical equipment and by the application of a relevant set of rules. Some systems involve the use of signals while others do not. Some systems are specifically designed for single track railways for which a danger exists of both head-on and rear-end collision, as opposed to double track, whose main danger is rear-end collision.
A block system is referred to as the method of working in the UK, method of operation in the US and safeworking in Australia.
Contents
Block signalling methods
Strict timetable operation
Trains operate according to a strict timetable, that is cannot leave a station until an appointed time and until any other trains they were to meet at that station have arrived. Rarely used as a block system, as if one train is delayed, all trains it is scheduled to meet are delayed. This can quickly lead to all trains on the railway being affected.
This method is not authorised for use in the UK.
Timetable and Train Order
<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Popular on single track lines in North America up until the 1980s, Train Order operation was less a block system and more of a system of determining which trains would have the right of way when train movements would come into conflict. Trains would make use of a predetermined operating plan known as the timetable which made use of fixed passing locations often referred to as stations. Amendments to the operating plan would come from a train dispatcher in the form of train orders, transmitted to the trains via intermediaries known as agents or operators at train order stations.
This method is not currently authorised for use in the UK. A similar system, known as Telegraph and Crossing Order, was used in the 19th century, but after three serious head-on collisions in the 1870s (Menheniot, Cornwall Railway, 1873; Thorpe, Great Eastern Railway, 1874; Radstock, Somerset & Dorset Railway, 1876) its use was condemned.
In North American train order system was often implemented on top of other block systems when those block systems needed to be superseded. For example where manual or automatic block was implemented, train orders would be used to authorize movements into occupied blocks, against the current of traffic or where no current of traffic was established.
One Train Working
One Train Working (with train staff)
If a single track branch line is a dead end with a simple shuttle train service, then a single token is sufficient. The driver of any train entering the branch line (or occupying any part of it) must be in possession of the token, and no collision with another train is possible. For convenience in passing it from hand to hand, the token was often in the form of a staff, typically 800 mm long and 40 mm diameter, and is referred to as a train staff. Such a staff may be a wooden staff with a brass plate stating the section of line on which it is valid, or it may be in the form of a key.
In UK terminology, this method of working was originally referred to as One Engine in Steam (OES).
One Train Working (without train staff)
A modern variation of the One Train Working system operates without any train staff. On these lines the clearance of the controlled branch entry signal is the driver's sole authority to enter the branch, and once the train has passed that signal, the interlocking will hold it at 'danger' (and the signal cannot be cleared a subsequent time) until the branch service train, on its return journey has sequentially operated two track circuits at the start of the branch. Continuous train detection on the branch is not required. Safety is ensured by the interlocking circuitry, and if a track-circuit failure occurs then special emergency working by pilotman must be introduced.
Token Block
<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Authority to occupy a block is provided by physical possession of a token or train staff that is obtained in such a way that ensures that only one train is in a section of track at a time.
Ordinary Train Staff and Ticket (OTST) or (OTS&T)
Ordinary Train Staff sections
Some low traffic lines dispensed with Tickets and became Ordinary Train Staff sections (OTS).
Electric Train Staff (ETS)
These came in two sizes, large and miniature.
Manual Block System
Authority to occupy a block is conveyed to trains by the use of wayside signals manually controlled by human operators following various procedures to communicate with other block stations to ensure separation of trains.
Absolute Block
See British absolute block signalling.
Telegraph Block
Used on multiple track sections whereby the passage of trains from one point to the next was controlled by instruments connected by telegraph wires. Used extensively in Australia.[1]
Telephonic Block
In this system, the occupation of the track section between two collateral stations is agreed between its station masters, via telephone. For additional safety it can have additional layers of protection, like the a Regulating Post, with supervising powers connected to all the stations in a line; timetable (Portugal) and/or computer assistance (France).
Portugal, Spain and France, still use this system in main lines, although the length of track under this system is decreasing rapidly due to requiring plenty of man power and it's inherent perceived lack of safety as, usually, its safety relies solely on multiple layers of humans and simple station interlockings.
The Portuguese Telephonic Block, is one prime example of extensive use of this system, having been the main safety system in most of the Portuguese Railways network until mid-1990's due to lack of resources. Thus it evolved to try to provide multiple layers of safety, on single track saturated lines with diverse train types, albeit at the cost of high levels of staffing. Although the authority of train movement is sole responsibility of the stations, on the main lines, a regulating post oversees them and, in case of disturbance, will tell stations how the traffic should be organised. On the other hand, each train timetable has all interactions with other trains (crossing with other trains; trains that they overtake; trains that overtake them) clearly marked at the stations they should occur. Any deviation to that, like delays or extra trains, must be informed to the train crews in written. Despite, when two trains cross, in general, they both stop at the station, this system allows for good average speeds for fast trains, not much different from and automatic signalling line with similar line speeds but, if for some reason minor delays start spreading, bigger delays will start to occur as the system will revert to the added safety mode, due to the crossing alterations, which will imply added paperwork, which would not happen in automatic signalling
As per general rule, the block is closed, that is, permission must be obtained before a train is sent from one station to another. However, in France, on multiple tracks, the block is usually open in unidirectional track sections, that is, after the next station confirms that the previous train has vacated the section, the next train can immediately be sent to the next station, having the station master who sent the train to inform the next station at what time the train entered the section.
Tokenless Block
This a system for use on single track railways, which requires neither the use of tokens nor provision of continuous train detection through the section. The signalling is designed such that the controlling signals will only allow one train to enter the line. The signalman at the far end of the section must visually check that the whole train has left the section and not become divided.[2] Examples abound on railway systems throughout the world.[citation needed] The absence of a token does remove the one visible reassurance that the driver has and head on collisions have occurred where the driver of an unauthorised train has proceeded under the mistaken idea that he has authority to occupy the line.[citation needed]
Comparison of block systems
| Method of working | For use on | Movement authority by | Line proved clear by |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timetable operation | Single track | Adherence to timetable | Adherence to timetable |
| Timetable and train order operation | Single track | Adherence to timetable or possession of written train order | Adherence to timetable |
| Telephonic Block (Closed Block) | Primarily single track | Hand signal presented by the station master | Station master observation that train has passed complete and telephonic dispatch to previous station. The next train can only be dispatched with the next station station master authorization |
| Telephonic Block (Open Block) | Multiple track | Hand signal presented by the station master | Station master observation that train has passed complete and telephonic dispatch to previous station. The next train can then be dispatched, being the next station station master informed that a train has been dispatched in his direction. |
| Track warrant control | Primarily single track | Possession of track warrant | Dispatcher's receipt of verbal advice via radio that previous train has vacated the section |
| Direct traffic control | Primarily single track | Verbal authority via radio | Dispatcher's receipt of verbal advice via radio that previous train has vacated the section |
| Time Interval Working | Single or multiple track | Handsignal or clearance of section signal | Period of time elapsed since passage of previous train |
| One Train Working (with train staff) | Single track branch lines | Possession of train staff (and clearance of section signal, where provided) | Possession of train staff |
| One Train Working (without train staff) | Single track branch lines | Clearance of section signal | Sequential operation of train detection at entrance to section |
| Train Staff & Ticket | Single track | Possession of train staff or ticket (and clearance of section signal, where provided) | Overlaid block system or time interval working |
| Divisible Train Staff | Single track | Possession of train staff or portion thereof (and clearance of section signal, where provided) | Overlaid block system |
| Electric Token | Single track | Possession of token (and clearance of section signal, where provided) | Possession of token, cooperation between signalmen and signalman visually observing that previous train has vacated the section |
| No-signalman Token | Single track branch lines | Possession of token (and clearance of section signal, where provided) | Possession of token |
| No-signalman Token with Remote Crossing Loops | Single track | Possession of token | Possession of token |
| Radio Electronic Token Block | Primarily single track | Electronic token and verbal permission via radio | Possession of electronic token and signalman's receipt of verbal advice via radio that previous train has vacated the section |
| Tokenless Block | Single track | Clearance of section signal | Cooperation between signalmen and signalman visually observing that previous train has vacated the section |
| Absolute Block / Manual block | Primarily multiple track | Clearance of section signal | Cooperation between signalmen and signalman visually observing that previous train has vacated the section |
| Track Circuit Block / Centralized traffic control | Single or multiple track | Lineside signals | Continuous train detection |
| Cab signalling (various systems) | Single or multiple track | Cab signals | Continuous train detection |
| ERTMS Level 1 | Single or multiple track | Lineside signals or cab signals | Continuous train detection |
| ERTMS Level 2 | Single or multiple track | Lineside signals or cab signals | Continuous train detection |
| ERTMS Level 3 | Single or multiple track | Cab signals | Train continuously reports its position via GSM-R radio |
References
- ↑ Australian Railway Historical Society Bulletin, March, 1961 pp43-51
- ↑ Railway Group Standard GK/RT0051, page D1
